Series 2558: Constituent Correspondence, 2000-2003

Series Overview | Email Index | Orphaned Attachments | Other Files |


Email

36352

From: 		<Oneoftheleast@aol.com>
To: 		"feedback@sjmercury.com".Net.GOV_MAIL
CC: 		"doswork@uic.edu".Net.GOV_MAIL; "publicaffairs@panet.us-state.gov".Net.GOV_MAIL; "secretary@state.gov".Net.GOV_MAIL
Created: 	2/17/2000 7:32 AM
Subject: 	eDemocracy
Message: 		

"Even-as-you-do-it-unto-the-least-of-whom,-so-shall-you-do-it-unto-whom?"

Steve, 
Please read the following and check out the facts. It seems TOS is being 
circumbented by a news board monitor to impose personal values on member 
content.

Dear Kate Tipul:
     You have not notified me as to why or when this AOL account I am writing 
to you from was relegated to "Read only rights"
     This seems counter to Steve Case's welcome screen message about 
eDemocracy.
     I have written you a separate email about my other account which is 
appended at the end of this email.
     My last correspondence with you on this account follows.

     Subj:  Receipt for  Failure to notify member of "Read only" Status after 
one week +/- of being block
Date:   2/13/00 10:01:23 AM Alaskan Standard Time
From:   KMTipul
To: WHale33568


    Message subject:    Failure to notify member of "Read only" Status after 
one week +/- of being block
    When sent:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:42:52 EST
    Read by:            KMTipul
    When read:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:01:23 EST

     I don't know who you are, or why you feel so compelled to block me 
without giving me recourse to a TOS hearing, but I am asking you in the 
spirit of the ten commandments to reason with me on this. History is full of 
examples of the results of failing to reason together, and I care about AOL 
too much to want anything like this mark a change in the outcome of AOL's 
bright future.
     When AOL stock reaches __ who said they would start buying. But that 
seems a drastic way to get the vote to change management, but it's better 
than many of the other ways things change as I have read in the news over the 
past years. 
     That's why I take the time out of my life to drop you this note instead 
of simply folding up my [helicopter] tent on this first sign of circumventing 
TOS procedures  by AOL board monitors. 
     I am but a warner. Steve Case knows how the world works. Maybe you do 
too. I believe in the ten commandments. When I see behavior like this by 
those in authoiryt the fear of God makes me want to help correct it as soon 
as possible.
     Yours in hurt confusion and disappointment

     One of the least AOL members.



In a message dated 2/11/00 9:17:17 AM Alaskan Standard Time, KMTipul writes:

<< Subj:    Your posts on the News Channel Boards
 Date:  2/11/00 9:17:17 AM Alaskan Standard Time
 From:  KMTipul
 To:    MohammedJesus
 
 Dear Member -- 
 
 Due to the numerous instances of violations on the News Channel message 
boards that have been reported to the Community Action Team, this email 
serves as notification that your account has been blocked from posting to the 
News Channel Message Boards until further notice. 
 
 Blocking any member from posting is only done in extreme cases such as this. 
It serves as a 'cooling off' period, and also keeps that member from posting 
any more disruptive messages that could result in the loss of their AOL 
account.
 
 We encourage you to take this time away from the boards and review AOL's <A 
HREF="aol://4344:1732.TOSmain.13703245.560705398">Terms of Service</A>, AOL's 
<A HREF="aol://4344:1732.TOSresp.13706081.560705925">Community Guidelines</A>,
 as well as the News Channel's  <A 
HREF="aol://4344:2595.BRDguide.27989925.620087451">Posting Guidelines</A>. 
 
 Thanks for your cooperation.
 
 Kate Tipul
 ACI Program Manager
 AOL News Channel
  >>
"?>!":000:02:17:07:43:================Null Hypothesis:
     Kate Tipul, I still haven't heard from you as to what words I have used 
that substantiate your decision to block me from the news boards until 
further notice. Usually TOS is notified in this type of situation, the 
member's account is blocked, he or she must phone tos, the situation is 
explained, and the member is either suspended, or reinstated.
     To date, this has not happened in this situation. You have blocked me 
without notifying TOS, My account has not been blocked from logging on, I 
have not been able to make a phone call to the TOS department and discuss 
this situation. Nor have you responded with any details.
     This is my second request to you requesting further substantiation of 
why and on what basis my account has been suspended and that you refer the 
matter to the proper channels of TOS.
     In many cases I report my own posts to TOS as a courtesy to let them 
know I care enough to alert them to controversial material and to seek their 
feed back before a situation like this occurs where without ANY prior notic I 
find my account relegated to "read only rights" on first notice from you.
     "I don't know who you are or why you're doing what you are.[Big Wig 
shakes rabies dog tags]
     I have been a member in good standing on AOL for 3 years. The content 
and nature of my posts have not significantly changed. Maybe the security of 
my screen name was breeched and who else put up posts that have caused you to 
make this decision. Maybe some individual or group has a vendetta against me. 
{Hilary's failure to leave a tip comes to mind} Maybe you are new to my 
posts. Who knows? That's why I feel we need further dialogue. Do you?
     Why haven't you reported this situation to TOS?
     I don't know who you are, but I am a well educated person, and well 
respected in many places, and I know arbitrary behavior when I meet it. You 
have a position of great trust whoever you are, and I would appreciate a 
response from you that provides some details or that you refer this matter to 
the proper channels of TOS. [pow: furnace backfire]
     I have had a severe head injury about three weeks ago, and your 
relegating me to "read only rights" is blocking me from an important 
spiritual and psychological part of my life which doesn't make it any easier 
to recover.

"...we, and who else, bear witness Mohammed is one of the greatest 
caretakers, or custodians of the guidance of Jesus Christ ('Esu) and all 
those who have gone before us, ...we,..., Every individual and group have 
their rasulluulah... {who point towards the highest learning and teaching 
song and dance who heals all things:('Esu:-Jesus)[...]}

Subj:   Receipt for  Failure to Warn or Present Reasons to AOL Member prior 
to blocking [ringgg ...He
Date:   2/13/00 9:57:27 AM Alaskan Standard Time
From:   KMTipul
To: MohammedJesus


    Message subject:    Failure to Warn or Present Reasons to AOL Member 
prior to blocking [ringgg ...He
    When sent:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 12:57:39 EST
    Read by:            KMTipul
    When read:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:57:27 EST

Subj:   Receipt for  Part 1 of partial evidence re: Arbitrary behavior of New 
Monitors
Date:   2/13/00 9:58:28 AM Alaskan Standard Time
From:   KMTipul
To: MohammedJesus


    Message subject:    Part 1 of partial evidence re: Arbitrary behavior of 
New Monitors
    When sent:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:02:41 EST
    Read by:            KMTipul
    When read:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:58:28 EST

Subj:   Receipt for  Part 2 of evidence re: Arbitrary New Monitors (3rd part 
is email to KMTipul)
Date:   2/13/00 9:59:35 AM Alaskan Standard Time
From:   KMTipul
To: MohammedJesus


    Message subject:    Part 2 of evidence re: Arbitrary New Monitors (3rd 
part is email to KMTipul)
    When sent:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:04:31 EST
    Read by:            KMTipul
    When read:          Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:59:35 EST





- Attachment Filename: 	C:\archives\governor\mail\Governor Musgrove\_attach\eDemocracy\Mime.822


Attachments

edemocracy/mime.822